| This is an archive of past UESPWiki:Bot Requests discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page, except for maintenance such as updating links. |
Travelling Merchants
Per Spelling, there should be one L in Online:Travelling Merchants. I need a page move and updated links - well, I could do the move myself but the links require more energy than I have at the moment. —likelolwhat talk lulzy to me 00:53, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Done! Left a redirect for now. I also managed to find a dialogue error because I did a simple search and replace for the word. —Dillonn241 (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
ESO Sets again
Waiting for update sets ;) AlexL (talk) 07:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
- I'm gonna try and get it working with the new bot, so it may take a little while. If I can't get it in the next few days, though, I'll go ahead with the old bot. – Robin Hood (talk) 08:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
-
-
- And done! Results can be found here. – Robin Hood (talk) 07:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
-
Change LoreLink Template to the Hard Link
I have a couple of pages that use the LoreLink template a lot, and now I'm getting the expensive parser function cells category on my longest page. User:Vincentius1/Fanlore Timeline, and I might even get it for other pages, namely User:Vincentius1/Fiction/The Royal Lineage of House Ra'athim and User:Vincentius1/Fiction/Wild Elves of Tamriel. There's a whole lot to sift through, which is why I'm adding it here than doing it manually. It doesn't have to be right away, but the sooner, the better. --Vincentius1 (talk) 20:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
- Done for those three. Let me know if you want any other subpages converted. —Dillonn241 (talk) 21:48, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Converting a Legends template
A straightforward one, I just changed the Template:Legends Opponent Summary to the more appropriately named Template:Legends Deck Summary. I'd like to request a bot job to change all usages of the old template to the new one. Thanks in advance! --Ilaro (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- Done! —Dillonn241 (talk) 05:26, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
ESO Sets
Need sets update :( AlexL (talk) 11:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
- They were actually on my list of things to do today. They're done now. Results are here. – Robin Hood (talk) 20:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
2E 583 to 2E 582
I'm not quite sure how bots work on the wiki, but maybe one could be tasked with cleaning up all the leftover "2E 583" references, turning them into "2E 582"? --Rezalon (talk) 13:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- I'm aware of the statement from Leamon Tuttle on which this change would be based, but we honestly need this confirmed in an in-game source before we can discount Birds of Wrothgar. Developer hesitance to give any real information on dates since 2017's Morrowind update leaves us in a bit of a difficult situation as far as the wiki's reference guidelines are concerned. A discussion needs to happen before any bot job is carried out, as is the case with using any UOL source. —Legoless (talk) 21:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- I just poked around a bit to see what this would entail if we decide to do it, and it's a substantial job, mostly because there are several templates that link to those pages, never mind any direct links that might exist. And since we're effectively merging 583 into 582, which already exists, separating them back out after-the-fact would be virtually impossible. Long story short, we want to be 100% certain that this is what we want to do before we put the bot on it. If we're not, then as awkward of a "fix" as it is, it might actually be the better approach to have the Year template check for and silently change 2E 583 to 2E 582, just so it can be readily undone if needed, with no bot intervention required. – Robin Hood (talk) 02:04, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
(←) So this change definitely need to be made given the update to Birds of Wrothgar. 2E 583 has been officially retconned out of existence and I'm not aware of any legitimate use of that date in a lore context. It should be safe to change all instances of 2E 583 to 2E 582 in lorespace (excluding talk pages). This includes plain text as well, since {{Year}} is usually only used in the first instance of a date being mentioned. —Legoless (talk) 23:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- All instances you say? That sounds like a dangerous "blunt instrument" request that Enobot can do, but Enobot also needs a list of pages that isn't just an entire namespace. I can do every instance on a lorepage that uses {{Year}} if you think that would catch most of them? --Enodoc (talk) 18:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
-
- I believe RH is going to run the job. There is one exception that needs to be excluded from this: Lore:Birds of Wrothgar (old). —Legoless (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
-
-
- Done. – Robin Hood (talk) 20:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
-
License Fixing
I noticed that the license on many of the "File:ON-icon" files is incorrect, as these are direct pulls from the game files they should {{zenimage}}. Jeancey pointed out to me it would be a waste of time to sit and change all of the myself... I don't know how many this effects but it looks like over two thirds off them from a sample of 30. Thanks! Kiz(email - talk) 15:42, 25 October 2019 (GMT)
Update - After some testing, thanks RH, license changes to go ahead as above. Rolled into the same edits, original file names will be added to specify where the images originated from. Icon usage can be added in the same pass where practical which looks to be for every item type over than books due to the reuse of book icons for anywhere up to 30 items. Kiz(email - talk) 23:49, 28 October 2019 (GMT)
Completed - Bot run completed completed by HoodBot over data range of 28th through 31st October 2019. All files beginning with File:ON-icon- had license updates, were matched against the ESOLog to check that the images were the most up to date images and had item links added to allow easier checking in future. Edits done under this job carry the edit summary: Match ON-icons with log viewer. Anything not able to be match by the bot, or requiring updated images was flagged with a hidden category: Category:Online-Icons-Missing Original File. This category is being worked through by editors currently to match the remainder. Kiz(email - talk) 20:37, 7 November 2019 (GMT)
Add altartdeckcode for Legends Cards with Alternate Art
I collected a list of alternate art deckcode for cards with them via scripting and in game testing. I already updated Template:Legends Card Summary to support "altartdeckcode" parameter. Here is the data list, could you please update those "altartdeckcode" to corresponding card pages. --Champ (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2020 (GMT)
- Schema: (altartdeckcode):(card name)
ap:Alduin aY:Ash Servant bV:Blacksap Protector dN:Crushing Blow hp:Golden Saint hG:Grisly Gourmet in:Hive Defender ju:Laaneth jz:Leaflurker jI:Lightning Bolt km:Master of Arms kO:Morkul Gatekeeper mb:Piercing Javelin nW:Sharpshooter Scout pA:Stonetooth Scrapper pY:Swims-at-Night sq:Bruma Profiteer sr:Dark Harvester ss:Shrieking Harpy st:Raiding Party su:Nord Firebrand xf:Fighters Guild Recruit yZ:Divine Fervor za:Shadowfen Priest zb:Tree Minder zc:Shadow Shift zd:Finish Off ze:Rapid Shot zf:Suppress zg:Execute zh:Deadly Draugr zi:Thieves Guild Recruit zj:Haunting Spirit zl:Swift Strike zm:Brutal Ashlander zn:Murkwater Shaman zo:Murkwater Witch zp:Baandari Opportunist zq:The Black Dragon zr:Crusader's Assault zs:Unstoppable Rage zt:Squish the Wimpy zu:Brotherhood Sanctuary zv:Sanctuary Pet zw:Mudcrab Anklesnapper zx:Greybeard Mentor zy:Spoils of War zz:Giant Bat zE:Belligerent Giant zF:Royal Sage zG:Odirniran Necromancer zH:Battlerage Orc zI:Eastmarch Crusader zJ:Bruma Armorer zK:Lesser Ward zL:Elusive Schemer zM:Triumphant Jarl zN:Arrow Storm zO:Midnight Snack zQ:Varanis Courier zR:Dark Rebirth zS:Cunning Ally zT:Firebolt zU:Eclipse Baroness zV:Rihad Battlemage zW:Imperial Reinforcements zX:Haafingar Marauder zY:Gravesinger zZ:Maple Shield Aa:Graystone Ravager Ab:Mulaamnir Ac:Immolating Blast Ad:Redoran Forerunner Ae:Drain Vitality Af:Doppelganger Ag:Crown Quartermaster Ah:Treasure Map Ai:Barter Aj:Loyal Housecarl Ak:Doomfang Ally Al:Revealing the Unseen Am:Black Soul Gem An:Swindler's Market
Indeko runestone glyphs
Would a bot be suitable for filling in values for Glyph of Prismatic Recovery and Glyph of Reduce Skill Cost? Seems like they'd be tedious to populate by hand. --Xyzzy Talk 12:40, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure a bot job would actually be more time-efficient than doing them by hand, we've done the previous ones by hand. We also don't have values for them yet, but I can get those later on tonight. Just to check, you're referencing the different level/quality levels for each Glyph? Kiz (email - talk) 17:36, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
| Prev: Archive 3 | Up: Bot Requests | Next: None |